Official Development Assistance (ODA) an Its Relation with Democracy Promotion and Sovereignty

Bilal Çıplak
1.398 401


Official Development Assistance (ODA) has become a way that states exert their influence over the other states. However, the concept of the ODA has been a point of debate, particularly in relation with democracy promotion and sovereignty. This paper tries to clarify each concept and explain their relations with each other.

Tam metin:



Aviles, W. (2012). The Political Economy of Low-Intensity Democracy: Colombia and Honduras and Venezuela. In Cox, Ronald W., Corporate Power and Globalization in US Foreign Policy (Routledge Press).

Carothers, T. (1996). Assessing Democracy Assistance: the Case of Romania. Washington D.C.: Carnegie Endowment Group.

Carothers, T. (1999). Aiding Democracy Abroad: Learning Curve. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Publications.

Carothers, T. (2010). Elusive Synthesis, Journal of Democracy, 12-26.

Çıplak, B. (2014). Democracy promotion and Turkey. ProQuest ETD Collection for FIU. Paper AAI3644757. [Available online at:] Retrieved online at: 10.08.2016.

Çıplak, B. and Ahmet K. (2016). The Militarization of the Turkey’s Democracy Promotion Policy in the Arab Middle East (AME). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 5(10), 63-75.

Czempiel, E. (1996). Kant’s Theorem. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 3(1), 79–101.

Dalacoura, K. (2010). US Foreign Policy and Democracy Promotion in the Middle East: Theoretical Perspectives and Policy Recommendations. Ortadoğu Etütleri, 57-76.

Global Humanitarian Assistance (2014). [ Available online at:] Retrieved online at: 27.09.2016.

Huntington, S.(1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Hynes, W and Simon S. (2013). “The Evolution of Official Development Assistance: Achievements, Criticisms and a Way Forward. OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers, No. 12, OECD Publishing. [Available online at:] Retrieved online at: 21.09.2016.

Karakas, C. (2010). Democracy Promotion or Demotion? US and German Reactions to the Rise of Political Islam in Turkey. Standing Group on International Relations.

Kulaklikaya, M. and Rahman N. (2010). Turkey as a new player in development cooperation. Insight Turkey, 131-145.

Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social prerequisites of democracy. The American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69-105.

Lobell, S. E, N. M. Ripsman and J. W. Taliaferro (2009). Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

McFaul, M. (2004-2005). Democracy Promotion as a World Value. The Washington Quarterly, 147-163.

McFaul, M. (2007). Ukraine Imports Democracy: External Influences in the Orange Revolution. International Security, 45-83.

Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organizations, 51(4), 513-553.

OECD (2008). Is it ODA?. [Available online at:] Retrieved online at: 14.09.2016.

OECD (2015).

Robinson, W. I. (1996). Promoting polyarchy: globalization, the US intervention, and hegemony. Cambridge University Press.

Schraeder, P. J. (2003). The state of the art in international democracy promotion: Results of a joint European-North American research network. Democratization, 20(2), 21-44.

Schweller, R. L. (2000). US Democracy promotion: Realist reflections, in: Cox et al. 41-62.

Stanly, T. (2013). [Available online at:] Retrieved online at: 07.09.2016.

So, A. (1990). Social change and development: modernization, dependency, and world system theories. California: Sage Publications.

TIKA (2012). TIKA Development Report.

Youngs, R. (2002). The EU and democracy promotion in the mediterranean: A new or disingenuous Strategy?. Paper Presented at 'The EU and civil society development in North Africa' International Seminar, Rabat.

World Bank. (2014) Poverty overview.